on the eco-system,

The impossible approach,

It is a hard bargain, the perception in itself of our cosmos. a human positioned within, drawn to attend the unavoidble, inspired to discover the incomprehensible. a natural world of which we do percieve borders of comprehension who do not correspond to the borders we can suppose, hence science. The possible supposition we will never comprehend fully even the natural world, it's shifts and expansions or retractions. If neglected this supposition and stating the gradual discovery of the total comsmological structures, it's evolvements by science, becoming religion. The emotional need to position a god, in an external position to our realities, to shift the responsibility and anguish of existence of our backs. Not only wrestling with the position of includedness within the problem of comprehension, but the knowledge of death defining another limit to our effort, timeliness, the question of has our life sense. This is our world, our cosmos, uncomprehended, undefined in it's limits, the promise of mystery ever enduring, and the ongoing struggle to compromise, and anchor our perceptions to the laws of the unavoidable, the daily survival. Humankind is not apt to see itself, the every individual's meaning by cohesion to our social and generational perpetration. For now our ill-comprehended universe gives us little consolation. That is the eco-system we live in, that is the minimal comprehension that adds to our perceptions, our anguishes, our fears.

The consequences are here, the universe of man, ever-shifting, our perceptions ever reassessed by science, but finite and limited by definition, this sum of the natural world and our proper perceptions, the realistic logic of questioning time, merely defined by our own mortality, a meager anchor to the theory of existence of time at all. That should define the eco-system as the dependent variable in our simplified equation of three variables interacting...

m.